🎯

brainstorming

🎯Skill

from ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub

VibeIndex|
What it does

Transforms rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured Socratic questioning, exploring alternatives, and incremental validation.

πŸ“¦

Part of

ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub(16 items)

brainstorming

Installation

npxRun with npx
npx ai-agent-hub@latest
npxRun with npx
npx ai-agent-hub@latest --project-only --mode squad
npxRun with npx
npx ai-agent-hub@latest --desktop-only --mode classic
npxRun with npx
npx ai-agent-hub@latest --both --mode auto
Node.jsRun Node.js server
node .claude/scripts/context-bridge.js # Squad mode: Should run without errors

+ 2 more commands

πŸ“– Extracted from docs: ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub
4Installs
-
AddedFeb 4, 2026

Skill Details

SKILL.md

Use when creating or developing anything, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured Socratic questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation

Overview

# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

Overview

Transform rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured questioning and alternative exploration.

Core principle: Ask questions to understand, explore alternatives, present design incrementally for validation.

Announce skill usage at start of session.

When to Use This Skill

Activate this skill when:

  • Request contains "I have an idea for..." or "I want to build..."
  • User asks "help me design..." or "what's the best approach for..."
  • Requirements are vague or high-level
  • Multiple approaches might work
  • Before writing any code or implementation plans

The Three-Phase Process

| Phase | Key Activities | Tool Usage | Output |

|-------|----------------|------------|--------|

| 1. Understanding | Ask questions (one at a time) | AskUserQuestion for choices | Purpose, constraints, criteria |

| 2. Exploration | Propose 2-3 approaches | AskUserQuestion for approach selection | Architecture options with trade-offs |

| 3. Design Presentation | Present in 200-300 word sections | Open-ended questions | Complete design with validation |

Phase 1: Understanding

Goal: Gather purpose, constraints, and success criteria.

Process:

  • Check current project state in working directory
  • Ask ONE question at a time to refine the idea
  • Use AskUserQuestion tool when presenting multiple choice options
  • Gather: Purpose, constraints, success criteria

Tool Usage:

Use AskUserQuestion for clarifying questions with 2-4 clear options.

Example: "Where should the authentication data be stored?" with options for Session storage, Local storage, Cookies, each with trade-off descriptions.

See references/example-session-auth.md for complete Phase 1 example.

Phase 2: Exploration

Goal: Propose 2-3 different architectural approaches with explicit trade-offs.

Process:

  • Propose 2-3 different approaches
  • For each: Core architecture, trade-offs, complexity assessment
  • Use AskUserQuestion tool to present approaches as structured choices
  • Include trade-off comparison table when helpful

Trade-off Format:

| Approach | Pros | Cons | Complexity |

|----------|------|------|------------|

| Option 1 | Benefits | Drawbacks | Low/Med/High |

| Option 2 | Benefits | Drawbacks | Low/Med/High |

| Option 3 | Benefits | Drawbacks | Low/Med/High |

See references/example-session-dashboard.md for complete Phase 2 example with SSE vs WebSockets vs Polling comparison.

Phase 3: Design Presentation

Goal: Present complete design incrementally, validating each section.

Process:

  • Present in 200-300 word sections
  • Cover: Architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
  • Ask after each section: "Does this look right so far?"
  • Use open-ended questions to allow freeform feedback

Typical Sections:

  1. Architecture overview
  2. Component details
  3. Data flow
  4. Error handling
  5. Security considerations
  6. Implementation priorities

Validation Pattern:

After each section, pause for feedback before proceeding to next section.

Tool Usage Guidelines

Use AskUserQuestion Tool For:

  • Phase 1: Clarifying questions with 2-4 clear options
  • Phase 2: Architectural approach selection (2-3 alternatives)
  • Any decision with distinct, mutually exclusive choices
  • When options have clear trade-offs to explain

Benefits:

  • Structured presentation of options with descriptions
  • Clear trade-off visibility
  • Forces explicit choice (prevents vague "maybe both" responses)

Use Open-Ended Questions For:

  • Phase 3: Design validation
  • When detailed feedback or explanation is needed
  • When the user should describe their own requirements
  • When structured options would limit creative input

Non-Linear Progression

Flexibility is key. Go backward when needed - don't force linear progression.

Return to Phase 1 when:

  • User reveals new constraint during Phase 2 or 3
  • Validation shows fundamental gap in requirements
  • Something doesn't make sense

Return to Phase 2 when:

  • User questions the chosen approach during Phase 3
  • New information suggests a different approach would be better

Continue forward when:

  • All requirements are clear
  • Chosen approach is validated
  • No new constraints emerge

Key Principles

| Principle | Application |

|-----------|-------------|

| One question at a time | Phase 1: Single question per message, use AskUserQuestion for choices |

| Structured choices | Use AskUserQuestion tool for 2-4 options with trade-offs |

| YAGNI ruthlessly | Remove unnecessary features from all designs |

| Explore alternatives | Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling |

| Incremental validation | Present design in sections, validate each |

| Flexible progression | Go backward when needed - flexibility > rigidity |

After Brainstorming Completes

Consider these optional next steps:

  • Document the design in project's design documentation
  • Break down the design into actionable implementation tasks
  • Create a git branch or workspace for isolated development

Use templates in assets/design-doc-template.md and assets/decision-matrix-template.md for structured documentation.

Examples

Complete brainstorming sessions:

  • references/example-session-auth.md - Authentication storage design (JWT vs Session vs Cookies)
  • references/example-session-dashboard.md - Real-time dashboard design (SSE vs WebSockets vs Polling)

Output templates:

  • assets/design-doc-template.md - Structured design document format
  • assets/decision-matrix-template.md - Weighted decision comparison format

More from this repository10

🎯
testing-strategy-builder🎯Skill

testing-strategy-builder skill from ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub

🎯
prototype-to-production🎯Skill

prototype-to-production skill from ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub

🎯
react-server-components-framework🎯Skill

react-server-components-framework skill from ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub

🎯
ai-native-development🎯Skill

ai-native-development skill from ariegoldkin/ai-agent-hub

🎯
code-review-playbook🎯Skill

Systematically guides and standardizes code review processes, providing structured feedback templates, language-specific checklists, and best practices for thorough, constructive team collaboration.

🎯
devops-&-deployment🎯Skill

Automates DevOps workflows and deployment processes, streamlining infrastructure management and continuous integration for AI agent development.

🎯
design-system-starter🎯Skill

Generates comprehensive design system resources, providing structured templates, component architectures, and accessibility guidelines to create consistent and scalable UI designs across products.

🎯
database-schema-designer🎯Skill

Designs comprehensive, scalable database schemas with normalization, indexing, and performance optimization techniques for SQL and NoSQL databases.

🎯
architecture-decision-record🎯Skill

Generates Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document and track significant architectural decisions, following the Nygard template with context, decision, and consequences.

🎯
api-design-framework🎯Skill

Designs comprehensive API architectures with best practices for REST, GraphQL, and gRPC, ensuring consistent, scalable, and developer-friendly backend services.