🎯

superspec-brainstorm

🎯Skill

from bryanhoo/superspec-skills

VibeIndex|
What it does

Systematically clarifies and validates vague Superspec change requests through structured, incremental questioning and design exploration.

πŸ“¦

Part of

bryanhoo/superspec-skills(5 items)

superspec-brainstorm

Installation

πŸ“‹ No install commands found in docs. Showing default command. Check GitHub for actual instructions.
Quick InstallInstall with npx
npx skills add bryanhoo/superspec-skills --skill superspec-brainstorm
3Installs
-
AddedFeb 4, 2026

Skill Details

SKILL.md

Use when a Superspec change is underspecified and you need to clarify intent, scope, constraints, affected specs, and success criteria before writing proposal/specs.

Overview

# Superspec Brainstorm

Overview

Turn a vague change request into proposal-ready inputs plus a small, validated "design seed" (still at proposal/specs level, not implementation).

Rules (non-negotiable)

  • Ask EXACTLY ONE question per message.
  • Do not combine two questions into one message (even if short).
  • Prefer multiple-choice options when possible.
  • Do NOT run openspec commands.
  • If you need more context, ask the user to paste relevant JSON/text or provide file paths; do not run commands to fetch it.
  • Do NOT write or modify any files. Output is working notes only.
  • Stay within proposal/specs scope; avoid implementation details (no file/module lists, no concrete code, no micro-optimizations).

Process

A) Understand the idea (questions, one at a time)

  1. Start by asking for context if missing (pick 1-3): relevant file paths, existing specs, API contracts, user stories, current behavior examples.
  2. Ask questions ONE PER MESSAGE to fill the "Proposal-ready Notes" (match proposal.md headings) in this order:

- Intent

- Background

- Scope (in/out)

- Constraints

- Affected Specs (New/Modified; names decided; kebab-case)

- Success Criteria

- Risks & Mitigations (only if real)

B) Explore approaches (2-3 options with trade-offs)

Once Notes are concrete (especially constraints + success criteria), propose 2-3 approaches.

  • Lead with the recommended approach and explain why.
  • Keep options at the behavior/contract level (what changes, trade-offs, risks).
  • Do not turn this into a detailed implementation plan.

C) Present the design seed (incremental validation)

If the change is non-trivial, write the "Design Seed" in 200-300 word sections.

  • Post ONE section per message.
  • After the section, ask exactly ONE question: "Does this look right so far?" and STOP.
  • Only proceed after the user confirms or corrects.

D) Stop / handoff

Stop when:

  • Notes are concrete, AND
  • An approach is selected (or explicitly deferred), AND
  • Either the design seed is validated or explicitly skipped.

Handoff guidance:

  • The "Proposal-ready Notes" block is intended to be copied into proposal.md verbatim.
  • "Affected Specs" names drive concrete delta spec files at specs//spec.md.

Output Contract

Maintain and update this block as you go.

```markdown

Brainstorming Output

1) Proposal-ready Notes (paste into proposal.md verbatim)

Intent

  • ...

Background

  • ...

Scope

In scope

  • ...

Out of scope

  • ...

Constraints

  • ...

Affected Specs

New capabilities

  • : ...

Modified capabilities

  • : ...

Success Criteria

  • ...

Risks & Mitigations

  • Risk: ...

Mitigation: ...

2) Approaches (2-3 options, REQUIRED)

Option A (Recommended):

  • What changes (behavior/contract): ...
  • Pros: ...
  • Cons / trade-offs: ...
  • Risks: ...

Option B:

  • What changes (behavior/contract): ...
  • Pros: ...
  • Cons / trade-offs: ...
  • Risks: ...

Option C (optional):

  • ...

3) Design Seed (optional but recommended)

Section 1 (Architecture / Components) [200-300 words]

...

Section 2 (Data / Control Flow) [200-300 words]

...

Section 3 (Error Handling / Testing) [200-300 words]

...

4) Open Questions (if any)

  • ...

```

Common mistakes

  • Stopping after notes without exploring approaches.
  • Providing only one approach (no trade-offs).
  • Mixing multiple questions into one message.
  • Turning design seed into implementation details.
  • Running openspec or writing files during brainstorming.