🎯

political-philosophy

🎯Skill

from chrislemke/stoffy

VibeIndex|
What it does

Analyzes political philosophy concepts like justice, rights, liberty, and state legitimacy through key thinkers and theoretical frameworks.

πŸ“¦

Part of

chrislemke/stoffy(41 items)

political-philosophy

Installation

PythonRun Python server
python -m consciousness run
PythonRun Python server
python -m consciousness run --dev
PythonRun Python server
python -m consciousness check
pip installInstall Python package
pip install watchfiles typer rich pyyaml aiosqlite
πŸ“– Extracted from docs: chrislemke/stoffy
4Installs
-
AddedFeb 4, 2026

Skill Details

SKILL.md

"Master political philosophy - justice, rights, liberty, democracy, state legitimacy. Use for: justice, political authority, rights, freedom, social contract. Triggers: 'justice', 'political', 'rights', 'liberty', 'freedom', 'democracy', 'Rawls', 'social contract', 'state', 'legitimacy', 'authority', 'equality', 'libertarianism', 'distributive justice', 'liberalism', 'communitarianism', 'republicanism'."

Overview

# Political Philosophy Skill

Master the fundamental questions of political life: What justifies the state? What is justice? What are our rights?

Core Questions

| Question | Issue |

|----------|-------|

| Why obey the state? | Political obligation |

| What is justice? | Distributive principles |

| What are rights? | Nature and basis of rights |

| What is freedom? | Liberty, positive/negative |

| Who should rule? | Democratic theory |

---

State Legitimacy

Social Contract Theories

```

SOCIAL CONTRACT TRADITION

═════════════════════════

HOBBES (1588-1679)

β”œβ”€β”€ State of nature: War of all against all

β”œβ”€β”€ Life: "Solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, short"

β”œβ”€β”€ Contract: Give up freedom for security

└── Result: Absolute sovereign (Leviathan)

LOCKE (1632-1704)

β”œβ”€β”€ State of nature: Peace with inconveniences

β”œβ”€β”€ Natural rights: Life, liberty, property

β”œβ”€β”€ Contract: Limited government to protect rights

└── Result: Liberal constitutional state

ROUSSEAU (1712-1778)

β”œβ”€β”€ State of nature: Noble savage, corrupted by society

β”œβ”€β”€ Problem: How to be free yet bound by law?

β”œβ”€β”€ Solution: General will (not will of all)

└── Result: Direct democracy, civic virtue

```

Contemporary Social Contract

Rawls: Hypothetical contract behind veil of ignorance

Gauthier: Bargaining among rational self-interested agents

Scanlon: Principles no one could reasonably reject

---

Justice

Rawls's Theory

```

RAWLSIAN JUSTICE

════════════════

ORIGINAL POSITION

β”œβ”€β”€ Hypothetical choice situation

β”œβ”€β”€ Veil of ignorance: Don't know your place

β”œβ”€β”€ Rational, self-interested choosers

└── What principles would you choose?

TWO PRINCIPLES

  1. LIBERTY PRINCIPLE

└── Equal basic liberties for all

└── Speech, conscience, association, etc.

  1. DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE

└── Inequalities only if they benefit worst-off

└── With fair equality of opportunity

PRIORITY:

Liberty > Fair opportunity > Difference principle

```

Alternative Theories

| Theory | Key Thinker | Principle |

|--------|-------------|-----------|

| Utilitarianism | Mill | Maximize total welfare |

| Libertarianism | Nozick | Minimal state, property rights |

| Communitarianism | Sandel, MacIntyre | Community shapes justice |

| Capabilities | Sen, Nussbaum | Ensure capabilities for all |

Nozick's Entitlement Theory

```

LIBERTARIAN JUSTICE

═══════════════════

JUSTICE IN ACQUISITION

β”œβ”€β”€ How did you originally get it?

└── Must be legitimate

JUSTICE IN TRANSFER

β”œβ”€β”€ Voluntary exchange

└── Gift, sale, etc.

RECTIFICATION

β”œβ”€β”€ Correct past injustices

└── Compensation, restitution

MINIMAL STATE

β”œβ”€β”€ Only protection services

β”œβ”€β”€ No redistribution

└── "Taxation is forced labor"

```

---

Liberty

Negative vs. Positive Freedom

Negative (Berlin): Freedom FROM interference

  • You're free if no one stops you
  • Liberal tradition

Positive: Freedom TO achieve goals

  • You're free if you can realize your potential
  • May require resources, support

Republican Liberty

Non-Domination (Pettit):

  • Freedom as absence of arbitrary power over you
  • Not just non-interference
  • Slave with kind master is still unfree

---

Rights

Nature of Rights

Natural Rights: Pre-political, inherent in persons

Legal Rights: Created by law, conventional

Moral Rights: May or may not be legal

Rights as Trumps (Dworkin)

Rights override utilitarian calculations

Individual rights > Collective good

Will Theory vs. Interest Theory

Will Theory: Rights protect choices

Interest Theory: Rights protect interests

---

Democracy

Justifications

| Justification | Claim |

|---------------|-------|

| Intrinsic | Democratic participation is valuable in itself |

| Instrumental | Democracy produces best outcomes |

| Epistemic | Collective wisdom (Condorcet) |

| Procedural | Fair procedure regardless of outcome |

Problems

  • Tyranny of majority
  • Voter ignorance
  • Special interests
  • Minority rights

---

Key Debates

Liberty vs. Equality

  • Trade-off or compatible?
  • Economic liberty vs. economic equality
  • Formal vs. substantive equality

Individual vs. Community

  • Liberal: Individual prior to community
  • Communitarian: Community shapes individuals
  • Identity, tradition, solidarity

Multiculturalism

  • Cultural rights
  • Recognition
  • Integration vs. assimilation

---

Key Vocabulary

| Term | Meaning |

|------|---------|

| Legitimacy | Rightful authority |

| Sovereignty | Supreme power |

| Social contract | Agreement creating state |

| General will | Common good (Rousseau) |

| Veil of ignorance | Not knowing one's place |

| Difference principle | Benefit worst-off |

| Negative liberty | Freedom from interference |

| Positive liberty | Freedom to achieve |

| Natural rights | Pre-political rights |

| Distributive justice | Fair distribution |

---

Integration with Repository

Related Themes

  • thoughts/morality/: Justice, rights
  • thoughts/free_will/: Political freedom