review

REQUIRED: Before conducting ANY code review, you MUST load the relevant persona reference file(s) using the Read tool. These references contain the specific review priorities, perspective, and evaluation criteria for each reviewer persona.

1. Collect the code/diff context plus the user's goals (bugs, architecture, performance, etc.).
2. MANDATORY: Parse reviewer hints (e.g., "perf, react, typescript") and READ the matching reference file(s) directly using the Read tool BEFORE reviewing:

- AI/ML concerns → Read references/ai-reviewer.md FIRST

- Type system concerns → Read references/anders-reviewer.md FIRST

- Testing/TDD concerns → Read references/beck-reviewer.md FIRST

- Performance/abstraction → Read references/bjarne-reviewer.md FIRST

- Innovation/pragmatism → Read references/brendan-reviewer.md FIRST

- Low-level performance → Read references/carmack-reviewer.md FIRST

- Distributed systems → Read references/dean-reviewer.md FIRST

- Convention/simplicity → Read references/dhh-reviewer.md FIRST

- Refactoring/architecture → Read references/fowler-reviewer.md FIRST

- Collaboration/CI/CD → Read references/github-reviewer.md FIRST

- Abstraction/modularity → Read references/grace-reviewer.md FIRST

- Readability/Python → Read references/guido-reviewer.md FIRST

- Portability/Java → Read references/james-reviewer.md FIRST

- Compiler/tooling → Read references/lattner-reviewer.md FIRST

- Systems/rigor → Read references/linus-reviewer.md FIRST

- Developer joy/Ruby → Read references/matz-reviewer.md FIRST

- Observability/tracing → Read references/perf-reviewer.md FIRST

- React patterns → Read references/react-reviewer.md FIRST

- Go/concurrency → Read references/rob-reviewer.md FIRST

- Unix philosophy → Read references/unix-reviewer.md FIRST

1. Apply the reviewer persona's perspective by following their specific guidance and priorities from the loaded reference.
2. Cite specific files/lines, flag issues, and provide concrete recommendations.

DO NOT attempt to conduct a code review without first loading the appropriate persona reference file(s).

• Understand inputs/outputs, dependencies, and expected behavior before judging the change.
• Use the allowed tools (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to inspect implementation, history, and tests.
• Evaluate correctness, safety, performance, maintainability, and user impact.
• Flag missing tests, weak docs, regressions, or architectural drift; propose concrete fixes.
• Summarize findings in severity order, then note risks, questions, and verification steps.

When multiple personas are requested (e.g., "review this with Anders and React perspectives"):

• Read each relevant reference file from the list below
• Apply each perspective's priorities and concerns to the code
• Synthesize findings: highlight where perspectives agree or conflict
• Prioritize issues by severity across all perspectives

• AI Visionaries - adaptive systems, emergent behavior, data-driven design. [Open instructions](references/ai-reviewer.md)
• Anders Hejlsberg - strong typing, language/tooling ergonomics, structured APIs. [Open instructions](references/anders-reviewer.md)
• Kent Beck - TDD discipline, rapid feedback loops, adaptive design. [Open instructions](references/beck-reviewer.md)
• Bjarne Stroustrup - performance via abstraction, type safety, disciplined engineering. [Open instructions](references/bjarne-reviewer.md)
• Brendan Eich - rapid innovation, creative problem-solving, pragmatic experimentation. [Open instructions](references/brendan-reviewer.md)
• John Carmack - low-level excellence, graphics/perf tuning, precision thinking. [Open instructions](references/carmack-reviewer.md)
• Jeff Dean - planet-scale systems, efficiency, distributed reliability. [Open instructions](references/dean-reviewer.md)
• DHH - opinionated conventions, developer autonomy, simplicity over ceremony. [Open instructions](references/dhh-reviewer.md)
• Martin Fowler - refactoring readiness, evolutionary architecture, intentional design. [Open instructions](references/fowler-reviewer.md)
• GitHub Generation - collaboration hygiene, docs, CI/CD automation. [Open instructions](references/github-reviewer.md)
• Grace Hopper & Barbara Liskov - abstraction integrity, substitutability, modular design. [Open instructions](references/grace-reviewer.md)
• Guido van Rossum - readability, Pythonic simplicity, pragmatic clarity. [Open instructions](references/guido-reviewer.md)
• James Gosling - JVM portability, API stability, backward compatibility. [Open instructions](references/james-reviewer.md)
• Chris Lattner - compiler/toolchain innovation, language interoperability, performance. [Open instructions](references/lattner-reviewer.md)
• Linus Torvalds - kernel-level rigor, patch discipline, brutally honest feedback. [Open instructions](references/linus-reviewer.md)
• Yukihiro \"Matz\" Matsumoto - Ruby aesthetics, human-centric design, joy in code. [Open instructions](references/matz-reviewer.md)
• Brendan Gregg & Liz Rice - observability, tracing, data-first performance analysis. [Open instructions](references/perf-reviewer.md)
• React Core Maintainer - hooks, concurrent rendering, DX-focused component patterns. [Open instructions](references/react-reviewer.md)
• Rob Pike - Go/Unix minimalism, concurrency primitives, composable tooling. [Open instructions](references/rob-reviewer.md)
• Unix Traditionalist - small sharp tools, composability, text-first automation. [Open instructions](references/unix-reviewer.md)

Each reference stays out of context until explicitly opened, keeping Claude's context lean while still giving fast access to the original, detailed reviewer guidance.