Choose a workflow based on your current situation:
New Design Workflow
Use when: Creating a new interface, dashboard, visualization, or educational content from scratch
Time: 2-4 hours
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
```
New Design Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Orient to cognitive principles
- [ ] Step 2: Structure design thinking with frameworks
- [ ] Step 3: Apply domain-specific guidance
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate design for cognitive alignment
- [ ] Step 5: Check for common mistakes
- [ ] Step 6: Iterate based on findings
```
Step 1: Orient to cognitive principles
Start with [Cognitive Foundations](resources/cognitive-foundations.md) for deep understanding of WHY designs work (perception, memory, Gestalt principles) OR use [Quick Reference](resources/quick-reference.md) for rapid orientation (20 core principles, decision rules). Foundations give you theoretical grounding; Quick Reference gets you started faster.
Step 2: Structure design thinking with frameworks
Use [Design Frameworks](resources/frameworks.md) to apply systematic approaches: Cognitive Design Pyramid (4-tier quality assessment), Design Feedback Loop (interaction cycles), and Three-Layer Visualization Model (data communication fidelity). These provide repeatable structure for design decisions.
Step 3: Apply domain-specific guidance
Choose your domain: [Data Visualization](resources/data-visualization.md) for charts/dashboards, [UX Product Design](resources/ux-product-design.md) for interfaces/apps, [Educational Design](resources/educational-design.md) for e-learning/training, or [Storytelling & Journalism](resources/storytelling-journalism.md) for data journalism/presentations. Apply tailored cognitive principles for your specific context.
Step 4: Evaluate design for cognitive alignment
Use [Evaluation Tools](resources/evaluation-tools.md) to assess systematically: Cognitive Design Checklist (8 dimensions including visibility, hierarchy, chunking) and Visualization Audit Framework (4 criteria: Clarity, Efficiency, Integrity, Aesthetics). Identify weaknesses and prioritize fixes.
Step 5: Check for common mistakes
Review [Cognitive Fallacies](resources/cognitive-fallacies.md) to prevent failures: chartjunk, truncated axes, 3D distortion, cognitive biases, data integrity violations. Ensure your design avoids misleading patterns.
Step 6: Iterate based on findings
Return to domain guidance or frameworks as needed. Fix issues identified in evaluation. Re-evaluate until design passes cognitive alignment criteria (avg score β₯3.5 on rubric).
---
Design Review Workflow
Use when: Evaluating existing designs for cognitive alignment, conducting design critiques, or diagnosing usability issues
Time: 30-60 minutes
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
```
Design Review Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Systematic assessment with evaluation tools
- [ ] Step 2: Quick checks for common mistakes
- [ ] Step 3: Rapid validation against core principles
- [ ] Step 4: Note issues and prioritize fixes
```
Step 1: Systematic assessment with evaluation tools
Start with [Evaluation Tools](resources/evaluation-tools.md) for comprehensive review: Apply Cognitive Design Checklist (visibility, hierarchy, chunking, simplicity, memory support, feedback, consistency, scanning) and Visualization Audit Framework (score Clarity, Efficiency, Integrity, Aesthetics 1-5). Identify failing dimensions.
Step 2: Quick checks for common mistakes
Reference [Cognitive Fallacies](resources/cognitive-fallacies.md) for rapid diagnosis: Look for chartjunk, truncated axes, 3D effects, misleading colors, data integrity violations. These are common culprits in cognitive failures.
Step 3: Rapid validation against core principles
Use [Quick Reference](resources/quick-reference.md) for fast validation: Apply 3-question check (Attention? Memory? Clarity?), verify chart selection matches task, check color usage, confirm chunking fits working memory. Catches major issues quickly.
Step 4: Note issues and prioritize fixes
Document findings with severity: CRITICAL (integrity violations, accessibility failures), HIGH (clarity/efficiency issues preventing use), MEDIUM (suboptimal patterns, aesthetic issues), LOW (minor optimizations). Prioritize fixes foundation-first (perception β coherence β engagement β behavior).
---
Quick Validation Workflow
Use when: Need rapid go/no-go decision, spot-checking changes, or validating against cognitive basics during active design work
Time: 5-10 minutes
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
```
Quick Validation Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Three-question rapid check
- [ ] Step 2: Spot checks if issues found
```
Step 1: Three-question rapid check
Use [Quick Reference](resources/quick-reference.md) and apply: (1) Attention - "Is it obvious what to look at first?" (visual hierarchy clear, primary elements salient, predictable scanning), (2) Memory - "Is user required to remember anything that could be shown?" (state visible, options presented, fits 4Β±1 chunks), (3) Clarity - "Can someone unfamiliar understand in 5 seconds?" (purpose graspable, no unnecessary decoration, familiar terminology). If all YES β likely cognitively sound.
Step 2: Spot checks if issues found
If any question fails, use [Evaluation Tools](resources/evaluation-tools.md) for targeted diagnosis: Failed attention? Check hierarchy and visual salience sections. Failed memory? Check chunking and memory support sections. Failed clarity? Check simplicity and labeling sections. Apply specific fixes from relevant section.
---