🎯

subagent-driven-development

🎯Skill

from nickcrew/claude-ctx-plugin

VibeIndex|
What it does

Dynamically dispatches specialized subagents to implement independent tasks with code review, enabling rapid, high-quality iterative development.

πŸ“¦

Part of

nickcrew/claude-ctx-plugin(60 items)

subagent-driven-development

Installation

PythonRun Python server
python examples/supersaiyan_demo.py # See it in action!
pip installInstall Python package
pip install claude-cortex
git cloneClone repository
git clone https://github.com/NickCrew/claude-cortex.git
pip installInstall Python package
pip install -e ".[dev]"
πŸ“– Extracted from docs: nickcrew/claude-ctx-plugin
8Installs
-
AddedFeb 4, 2026

Skill Details

SKILL.md

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates

Overview

# Subagent-Driven Development

Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with code review after each.

Core principle: Fresh subagent per task + review between tasks = high quality, fast iteration

Overview

vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):

  • Same session (no context switch)
  • Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)
  • Code review after each task (catch issues early)
  • Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)

When to use:

  • Staying in this session
  • Tasks are mostly independent
  • Want continuous progress with quality gates

When NOT to use:

  • Need to review plan first (use executing-plans)
  • Tasks are tightly coupled (manual execution better)
  • Plan needs revision (brainstorm first)

The Process

1. Load Plan

Read plan file, create TodoWrite with all tasks.

2. Execute Task with Subagent

For each task:

Dispatch fresh subagent:

```

Task tool (general-purpose):

description: "Implement Task N: [task name]"

prompt: |

You are implementing Task N from [plan-file].

Read that task carefully. Your job is to:

1. Implement exactly what the task specifies

2. Write tests (following TDD if task says to)

3. Verify implementation works

4. Commit your work

5. Report back

Work from: [directory]

Report: What you implemented, what you tested, test results, files changed, any issues

```

Subagent reports back with summary of work.

3. Review Subagent's Work

Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:

```

Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer):

Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md

WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: [from subagent's report]

PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task N from [plan-file]

BASE_SHA: [commit before task]

HEAD_SHA: [current commit]

DESCRIPTION: [task summary]

```

Code reviewer returns: Strengths, Issues (Critical/Important/Minor), Assessment

4. Apply Review Feedback

If issues found:

  • Fix Critical issues immediately
  • Fix Important issues before next task
  • Note Minor issues

Dispatch follow-up subagent if needed:

```

"Fix issues from code review: [list issues]"

```

5. Mark Complete, Next Task

  • Mark task as completed in TodoWrite
  • Move to next task
  • Repeat steps 2-5

6. Final Review

After all tasks complete, dispatch final code-reviewer:

  • Reviews entire implementation
  • Checks all plan requirements met
  • Validates overall architecture

7. Complete Development

After final review passes:

  • Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
  • REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
  • Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice

Example Workflow

```

You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.

[Load plan, create TodoWrite]

Task 1: Hook installation script

[Dispatch implementation subagent]

Subagent: Implemented install-hook with tests, 5/5 passing

[Get git SHAs, dispatch code-reviewer]

Reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage. Issues: None. Ready.

[Mark Task 1 complete]

Task 2: Recovery modes

[Dispatch implementation subagent]

Subagent: Added verify/repair, 8/8 tests passing

[Dispatch code-reviewer]

Reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Missing progress reporting

[Dispatch fix subagent]

Fix subagent: Added progress every 100 conversations

[Verify fix, mark Task 2 complete]

...

[After all tasks]

[Dispatch final code-reviewer]

Final reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge

Done!

```

Advantages

vs. Manual execution:

  • Subagents follow TDD naturally
  • Fresh context per task (no confusion)
  • Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)

vs. Executing Plans:

  • Same session (no handoff)
  • Continuous progress (no waiting)
  • Review checkpoints automatic

Cost:

  • More subagent invocations
  • But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)

Red Flags

Never:

  • Skip code review between tasks
  • Proceed with unfixed Critical issues
  • Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)
  • Implement without reading plan task

If subagent fails task:

  • Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions
  • Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)

Integration

Required workflow skills:

  • writing-plans - REQUIRED: Creates the plan that this skill executes
  • requesting-code-review - REQUIRED: Review after each task (see Step 3)
  • finishing-a-development-branch - REQUIRED: Complete development after all tasks (see Step 7)

Subagents must use:

  • test-driven-development - Subagents follow TDD for each task

Alternative workflow:

  • executing-plans - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution

See code-reviewer template: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md