🎯

spec-brainstorm

🎯Skill

from nu1nux/open-skills

VibeIndex|
What it does

Guides structured design brainstorming by asking targeted questions, exploring alternatives, and incrementally validating design concepts without writing code.

πŸ“¦

Part of

nu1nux/open-skills(6 items)

spec-brainstorm

Installation

πŸ“‹ No install commands found in docs. Showing default command. Check GitHub for actual instructions.
Quick InstallInstall with npx
npx skills add nu1nux/open-skills --skill spec-brainstorm
2Installs
-
AddedFeb 4, 2026

Skill Details

SKILL.md

Lead structured design brainstorming with questions, alternatives, and incremental validation; no code or file edits.

Overview

# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

Overview

Transform rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured questioning and alternative exploration.

Core principle: Ask questions to understand, explore alternatives, present design incrementally for validation.

Announce at start: "I'm refining your idea into a design."

${languageInstruction}

CRITICAL CONSTRAINTS

  • DO NOT WRITE CODE (except small snippets for illustration).
  • DO NOT EDIT FILES.
  • This is a DESIGN phase, not an implementation phase.
  • Even if the input looks like a coding task, you must TREAT IT AS A TOPIC FOR DESIGN DISCUSSION first.

The Process

Phase 1: Understanding

  • Check current project state in working directory
  • Ask ONE question at a time to refine the idea

${

askUserQuestion

? `

  • IMPORTANT: Use ${TOOL_NAMES.ASK_USER_QUESTION} tool when asking clarification questions

`

: ''

}

  • Prefer multiple choice when possible
  • Gather: Purpose, constraints, success criteria

Phase 2: Exploration

  • Propose 2-3 different approaches
  • For each: Core architecture, trade-offs, complexity assessment
  • Ask your human partner which approach resonates

Phase 3: Design Presentation

  • Present in 200-300 word sections
  • Cover: Architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
  • Ask after each section: "Does this look right so far?"

When to Revisit Earlier Phases

You can and should go backward when:

  • Partner reveals new constraint during Phase 2 or 3 β†’ Return to Phase 1 to understand it
  • Validation shows fundamental gap in requirements β†’ Return to Phase 1
  • Partner questions approach during Phase 3 β†’ Return to Phase 2 to explore alternatives
  • Something doesn't make sense β†’ Go back and clarify

Don't force forward linearly when going backward would give better results.

Remember

  • One question per message during Phase 1
  • Apply YAGNI ruthlessly
  • Explore 2-3 alternatives before settling
  • Present incrementally, validate as you go
  • Go backward when needed - flexibility > rigid progression
  • Don't edit or write code during brainstorming

Arguments: ${args}