🎯

curriculum-review-accessibility

🎯Skill

from pauljbernard/content

VibeIndex|
What it does

curriculum-review-accessibility skill from pauljbernard/content

πŸ“¦

Part of

pauljbernard/content(103 items)

curriculum-review-accessibility

Installation

πŸ“‹ No install commands found in docs. Showing default command. Check GitHub for actual instructions.
Quick InstallInstall with npx
npx skills add pauljbernard/content --skill curriculum-review-accessibility
6Installs
-
Last UpdatedNov 9, 2025

Skill Details

SKILL.md

Validate WCAG 2.1 compliance, screen reader compatibility, and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles implementation throughout curriculum materials. Use when checking accessibility, validating UDL, or ensuring compliance. Activates on "accessibility check", "WCAG validation", "UDL review", or "screen reader test".

Overview

# Accessibility Validation & UDL Compliance

Ensure all curriculum materials meet accessibility standards and implement Universal Design for Learning principles for all learners.

When to Use

  • Validate WCAG 2.1 compliance
  • Check UDL implementation
  • Test screen reader compatibility
  • Verify keyboard navigation
  • Ensure accessible formats

Required Inputs

  • Materials: Digital content, documents, multimedia
  • Standards: WCAG 2.1 Level (A, AA, AAA)
  • Platform: Web, PDF, LMS, etc.

Workflow

1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance Check

Perceivable:

βœ… Text alternatives for non-text content

βœ… Captions and transcripts for multimedia

βœ… Content can be presented in different ways

βœ… Sufficient color contrast (4.5:1 minimum)

βœ… Text can be resized to 200%

Operable:

βœ… All functionality available via keyboard

βœ… Enough time to read and interact

βœ… No content that causes seizures (flashing)

βœ… Navigation is clear and consistent

βœ… Input purposes identified

Understandable:

βœ… Text is readable and predictable

βœ… Pages appear and operate predictably

βœ… Input assistance for errors

βœ… Labels and instructions provided

Robust:

βœ… Compatible with assistive technologies

βœ… Proper markup and semantics

βœ… Name, role, value for all components

2. UDL Principles Assessment

Multiple Means of Representation:

  • βœ… Visual AND textual information
  • βœ… Audio descriptions available
  • βœ… Content in multiple formats
  • βœ… Key vocabulary defined
  • βœ… Background knowledge activated

Multiple Means of Engagement:

  • βœ… Student choice opportunities
  • βœ… Relevance and authenticity
  • βœ… Appropriate challenge level
  • βœ… Collaboration options
  • βœ… Self-reflection prompts

Multiple Means of Expression:

  • βœ… Multiple assessment formats
  • βœ… Varied response options
  • βœ… Scaffolds for practice
  • βœ… Tools and supports available
  • βœ… Progress monitoring

3. Generate Accessibility Report

```markdown

# Accessibility Review: [TOPIC]

Review Date: [Date]

Standards: WCAG 2.1 Level AA, UDL

Materials: [List]

Compliance Status

WCAG 2.1: [Pass/Fail] - [X/Y criteria met]

UDL Principles: [Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor]

Overall: [Ready/Needs Revision]

WCAG Issues Found

Critical (Level A) - Must Fix

  1. [Location]: Missing alt text for diagram

- Impact: Screen reader users cannot access content

- Fix: Add descriptive alt text: "[description]"

Important (Level AA) - Should Fix

  1. [Location]: Color contrast 3.2:1 (needs 4.5:1)

- Impact: Low vision users struggle to read

- Fix: Darken text or lighten background

Enhancement (Level AAA) - Nice to Have

  1. [Location]: No sign language interpretation

- Impact: Deaf users who prefer sign language

- Fix: Consider adding sign language video

Document Accessibility

PDF Review:

  • ❌ Headings not tagged
  • ❌ Reading order incorrect
  • βœ… Searchable text
  • ❌ Form fields unlabeled

Fixes Needed:

  1. Tag all headings with proper levels
  2. Fix reading order in Acrobat
  3. Add labels to form fields

Multimedia Accessibility

Videos:

  • ❌ No captions
  • ❌ No transcript
  • ❌ No audio description

Fixes: Add captions, transcripts, audio descriptions

UDL Implementation

Representation (Why)

βœ… Strengths:

  • Multiple formats provided (text, video, diagrams)
  • Vocabulary defined

⚠️ Gaps:

  • No audio version of readings
  • Limited visual alternatives

Engagement (How)

⚠️ Strengths:

  • Some choice in topics

βœ… Gaps:

  • Limited collaboration options
  • No self-regulation scaffolds

Expression (What)

⚠️ Strengths:

  • Two assessment format options

❌ Gaps:

  • No assistive technology support
  • Limited scaffolding tools

Keyboard Navigation

  • βœ… All buttons keyboard accessible
  • ❌ Skip navigation link missing
  • ❌ Focus indicators insufficient

Screen Reader Testing

  • ⚠️ Mostly compatible
  • ❌ Some tables not properly structured
  • ❌ Links not descriptive ("click here")

Recommendations

Priority 1 (Legal Compliance)

  1. Add alt text to all images
  2. Provide captions for videos
  3. Fix color contrast issues
  4. Tag PDF headings

Priority 2 (UDL Implementation)

  1. Offer audio versions of text
  2. Add student choice opportunities
  3. Provide multiple expression formats
  4. Include collaboration options

Priority 3 (Enhancement)

  1. Add audio descriptions
  2. Provide sign language
  3. Enhance keyboard navigation

---

Artifact Metadata:

  • WCAG Compliance: [Level]
  • UDL Rating: [Score]
  • Critical Issues: [Count]
  • Ready: [Yes/No]

```

4. CLI Interface

```bash

# Full accessibility review

/curriculum.review-accessibility --materials "curriculum-artifacts/" --standard "WCAG2.1-AA"

# PDF-specific

/curriculum.review-accessibility --pdf "student-handout.pdf"

# UDL focus

/curriculum.review-accessibility --focus "udl" --lessons "lessons/*.md"

# Help

/curriculum.review-accessibility --help

```

Exit Codes

  • 0: Fully compliant
  • 1: Issues found
  • 2: Cannot load materials
  • 3: Critical accessibility barriers