🎯

multi-repo

🎯Skill

from rysweet/amplihack

VibeIndex|
What it does

multi-repo skill from rysweet/amplihack

πŸ“¦

Part of

rysweet/amplihack(81 items)

multi-repo

Installation

uvxRun with uvx (Python)
uvx --from git+https://github.com/rysweet/amplihack amplihack claude
uvxRun with uvx (Python)
uvx --from git+https://github.com/rysweet/amplihack amplihack amplifier
uvxRun with uvx (Python)
uvx --from git+https://github.com/rysweet/amplihack amplihack copilot
git cloneClone repository
git clone https://github.com/rysweet/amplihack.git
CargoRun with Cargo (Rust)
cargo install --git https://github.com/rysweet/RustyClawd rusty

+ 2 more commands

πŸ“– Extracted from docs: rysweet/amplihack
8Installs
17
-
Last UpdatedJan 26, 2026

Skill Details

SKILL.md

Multi-repository orchestration for coordinating atomic changes across dependent repositories. Tracks dependency graphs, coordinates cross-repo PRs, and detects breaking changes.

Overview

# Multi-Repository Orchestration Skill

Purpose

Coordinate atomic changes across multiple repositories when features span repo boundaries. Track dependencies, manage linked PRs, and detect breaking changes before they propagate.

When to Use This Skill

USE FOR:

  • Changes that require coordinated updates across multiple repositories
  • Managing repository dependency graphs
  • Creating linked PRs that should merge together or in sequence
  • Detecting breaking changes that affect dependent repositories
  • Microservices or monorepo-alternative architectures

AVOID FOR:

  • Single-repository changes (use default workflow)
  • Forking/syncing operations (use git directly)
  • Documentation-only changes
  • Changes with no cross-repo dependencies

Storage Location

All multi-repo data is stored in ~/.amplihack/.claude/data/multi-repo/:

  • dependencies.yaml - Repository dependency graph
  • linked-prs.yaml - Currently active linked PR sets
  • breaking-changes.log - History of detected breaking changes

Dependency Graph Format

The dependency graph uses simple YAML:

```yaml

# .claude/data/multi-repo/dependencies.yaml

version: "1.0"

repositories:

my-org/api-server:

depends_on: []

exposes:

- type: api

name: REST API v2

contract: openapi.yaml

my-org/web-client:

depends_on:

- repo: my-org/api-server

type: api

version: ">=2.0"

exposes: []

my-org/mobile-app:

depends_on:

- repo: my-org/api-server

type: api

version: ">=2.0"

exposes: []

```

Core Operations

Operation 1: Initialize Dependency Graph

When: Setting up multi-repo tracking for the first time

Process:

  1. Create ~/.amplihack/.claude/data/multi-repo/ directory if not exists
  2. Create initial dependencies.yaml with current repository
  3. Prompt for known dependencies (repos this one depends on)
  4. Prompt for known dependents (repos that depend on this one)
  5. Save and display the graph

Command: "Initialize multi-repo dependencies"

Operation 2: Add Repository Dependency

When: Registering a new dependency relationship

Process:

  1. Read current dependencies.yaml
  2. Validate both repositories exist (via gh CLI)
  3. Add dependency entry with type and version constraint
  4. Update dependent repo's entry
  5. Save changes

Example:

```

"Add dependency: my-org/web-client depends on my-org/api-server for REST API"

```

Operation 3: Detect Breaking Changes

When: Before creating a PR that modifies a public interface

Process:

  1. Identify changed files in current branch
  2. Check if changes touch exposed contracts (API specs, schemas, exports)
  3. Look up dependents in dependency graph
  4. For each dependent:

- Clone/fetch latest (use worktree if local)

- Check if dependent uses affected interface

- Report potential breakage

  1. Generate impact report

Output:

```

Breaking Change Impact Report

=============================

Changed: my-org/api-server/openapi.yaml

- Removed endpoint: DELETE /users/{id}

- Modified field: User.email now required

Affected Dependents:

- my-org/web-client (uses DELETE /users/{id})

- my-org/mobile-app (no impact detected)

Recommendation: Coordinate changes with my-org/web-client

```

Operation 4: Create Linked PRs

When: Making atomic changes across multiple repositories

Process:

  1. User specifies the set of repos to update
  2. For each repo in order (respecting dependency graph):

- Create worktree or navigate to repo

- Create feature branch with common prefix

- Make changes

- Create PR with links to other PRs in set

  1. Track linked PRs in linked-prs.yaml
  2. Add cross-references in PR descriptions

Linked PR Format:

```yaml

# .claude/data/multi-repo/linked-prs.yaml

linked_sets:

- id: "auth-v2-migration"

created: "2025-11-25T10:00:00Z"

status: "pending"

prs:

- repo: my-org/api-server

pr: 123

status: "merged"

merge_order: 1

- repo: my-org/web-client

pr: 456

status: "approved"

merge_order: 2

- repo: my-org/mobile-app

pr: 789

status: "open"

merge_order: 3

```

Operation 5: Coordinate Merge Sequence

When: Merging a linked PR set

Process:

  1. Read linked PR set from linked-prs.yaml
  2. Verify all PRs are approved/ready
  3. Merge in dependency order (upstream first)
  4. Wait for CI to pass after each merge
  5. Update linked-prs status
  6. Report completion

Merge Order Logic:

  1. Repos with no dependencies merge first
  2. Repos with dependencies merge after their dependencies
  3. Circular dependencies: Error (should not exist in healthy graph)

Integration with Worktree Manager

When working across local repositories, leverage the worktree-manager agent:

  1. For each local repo in dependency graph:

- Use git worktree add to create isolated workspace

- Worktrees go in ./worktrees/{repo-name}-{branch}/

  1. Make coordinated changes across worktrees
  2. Commit and push from each worktree
  3. Clean up worktrees after PRs merged

Integration with PM Architect

For complex multi-repo projects:

  1. Use backlog-curator to track cross-repo items
  2. Use workstream-coordinator for multi-repo workstreams
  3. Linked PRs map to single workstream items
  4. Breaking change detection feeds into roadmap planning

Philosophy Alignment

Ruthless Simplicity:

  • YAML-based dependency graph (no database required)
  • Leverage existing git and gh CLI tools
  • Minimal skill surface area

Zero-BS Implementation:

  • All operations are functional from day one
  • No "planned" features - only what works now
  • Breaking change detection actually checks code

Modular Design:

  • Skill is self-contained
  • Data stored in simple files
  • Can be used independently or with PM Architect

Examples

Example 1: API Breaking Change

Scenario: Updating API endpoint signature

```

User: "I need to change the /users endpoint from GET to POST"

Skill Response:

  1. Detected change to api-server/openapi.yaml
  2. Scanned dependents:

- web-client: Uses GET /users in 3 locations

- mobile-app: Uses GET /users in 2 locations

  1. Impact: HIGH - 5 usages across 2 repositories

Recommended approach:

  1. Add POST /users endpoint (non-breaking)
  2. Create linked PRs to update web-client and mobile-app
  3. Deprecate GET /users with sunset date
  4. Remove GET /users after clients migrate

```

Example 2: Coordinated Feature Release

Scenario: New authentication flow spanning 3 repos

```

User: "Implement OAuth2 across api-server, web-client, and mobile-app"

Skill Response:

  1. Created linked PR set: "oauth2-implementation"
  2. Dependency order: api-server -> web-client, mobile-app (parallel)
  3. Created branches:

- api-server: feat/oauth2-backend

- web-client: feat/oauth2-frontend

- mobile-app: feat/oauth2-mobile

  1. PRs created with cross-references:

- api-server#123 (merge first)

- web-client#456 (after #123)

- mobile-app#789 (after #123)

```

Limitations

  • Dependency graph is per-workspace (not centralized)
  • Requires gh CLI authenticated for PR operations
  • Breaking change detection is heuristic (may miss runtime changes)
  • Circular dependencies are not supported (and shouldn't exist)

Success Criteria

  • Changes across repos are coordinated atomically
  • Breaking changes are detected before they cause production issues
  • PRs merge in correct dependency order
  • Teams have visibility into cross-repo impacts