🎯

brainstorming

🎯Skill

from xenitv1/claude-code-maestro

VibeIndex|
What it does

Collaboratively explores and refines project ideas through systematic design questioning, turning initial concepts into comprehensive, well-structured specifications before implementation.

πŸ“¦

Part of

xenitv1/claude-code-maestro(44 items)

brainstorming

Installation

Quick InstallInstall with npx
npx skills add xenitV1/claude-code-maestro
Add MarketplaceAdd marketplace to Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add xenitV1/claude-code-maestro
Install PluginInstall plugin from marketplace
/plugin install maestro@xenitV1-claude-code-maestro
πŸ“– Extracted from docs: xenitv1/claude-code-maestro
12Installs
-
AddedFeb 4, 2026

Skill Details

SKILL.md

Design-first methodology. Explore user intent, requirements and design before implementation. Turn ideas into fully formed specs through collaborative dialogue.

Overview

# πŸ’‘ BRAINSTORMING: DESIGN BEFORE CODE

> Philosophy: Understanding comes before implementation. A well-designed solution is half-implemented. Never code without a clear design.

HALLUCINATION FIREWALL MANDATE (CRITICAL): Never propose software components or libraries without verification. AI-generated designs frequently fail by hallucinating non-existent packages or misinterpreting their capabilities. Every recommended 3rd-party library MUST be validated using npm info or equivalent before the plan is finalized. Furthermore, you MUST provide at least one 'Counter-Architecture' (Steel-man argument) that challenges your primary recommendation to prevent homogenized or biased designs.

Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.

Process:

  1. Understand the current project context
  2. Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
  3. Present the design in small sections (200-300 words)
  4. Check after each section whether it looks right

---

πŸ“‹ WHEN TO USE

MUST use before:

  • Creating new features
  • Building new components
  • Adding significant functionality
  • Modifying core behavior
  • Any task that takes more than 30 minutes

Skip only for:

  • Simple bug fixes with obvious solutions
  • Documentation updates
  • Trivial configuration changes

πŸ”„ THE PROCESS

Phase 1: Understanding the Idea

First, check current project state:

  • Review relevant files and docs
  • Check recent commits
  • Understand existing patterns

Then ask questions one at a time:

  • MANDATORY: Use the AskUserQuestion tool for ALL questions.
  • Prefer multiple choice options within the tool whenever possible.
  • Open-ended questions should also use AskUserQuestion (users can use the 'Other' option).
  • Only one question per tool call.
  • If topic needs more exploration, break into multiple sequential tool calls.

Focus on understanding:

  • Purpose: What problem does this solve?
  • Constraints: What limitations exist?
  • Success criteria: How do we know it works?
  • Edge cases: What could go wrong?

Phase 2: Exploring Approaches

Always propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs:

```

I see three possible approaches:

Option A: [Name]

  • Pros: Simple, fast to implement
  • Cons: May not scale, harder to test
  • Best for: Quick prototypes

Option B: [Name]

  • Pros: Scalable, well-tested pattern
  • Cons: More complex, longer implementation
  • Best for: Production systems

Option C: [Name]

  • Pros: Flexible, future-proof
  • Cons: Over-engineered for current needs
  • Best for: When requirements are uncertain

My recommendation: Option B because [reasoning]

Which approach resonates with your goals?

```

Lead with your recommended option and explain why.

Phase 3: Presenting the Design

Once you understand what you're building, present the design:

  1. Break it into sections of 200-300 words
  2. Ask after each section: "Does this look right so far?"
  3. Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense

Cover these areas:

  • Architecture: How components fit together
  • Components: What pieces we need to build
  • Data flow: How information moves through the system
  • Error handling: What happens when things fail
  • Testing: How we verify it works

Phase 4: Documentation

After design is validated:

  1. Write the design to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD--design.md
  2. Commit the design document to git
  3. Ask: "Ready to set up for implementation?"

🎀 QUESTION TECHNIQUES

Multiple Choice (MANDATORY TOOL USE)

Always use the AskUserQuestion tool for structured feedback:

```json

{

"questions": [

{

"header": "Auth Method",

"question": "How should users authenticate?",

"options": [

{"label": "JWT Tokens", "description": "Stateless, scalable"},

{"label": "Server Sessions", "description": "Simple, secure"},

{"label": "OAuth Only", "description": "Delegate to providers"}

],

"multiSelect": false

}

]

}

```

Open-Ended (Using Tool)

Even for open-ended questions, use the tool. The CLI will provide an "Other" option for custom text input.

"What's the most important user story for this feature?"

Clarifying

"You mentioned 'fast' - what response time would feel fast enough?"

---

🚫 ANTI-PATTERNS TO AVOID

| Anti-Pattern | Better Approach |

|--------------|-----------------|

| Multiple questions at once | One question per message |

| Jumping to implementation | Complete design first |

| Assuming requirements | Ask to confirm |

| Presenting 1000-word designs | 200-300 word sections |

| Ignoring trade-offs | Always present alternatives |

| Skipping edge cases | Explore failure modes |

πŸ“ DESIGN DOCUMENT TEMPLATE

```markdown

# [Feature Name] Design

Date: YYYY-MM-DD

Author: Grandmaster (with user collaboration)

Status: Draft | Approved | Implemented

Problem Statement

What problem are we solving? Why does it matter?

Goals

  • Primary goal
  • Secondary goals
  • Non-goals (explicitly out of scope)

Approach

Architecture

How components fit together.

Components

  1. Component A

- Purpose

- Interface

- Dependencies

  1. Component B

- Purpose

- Interface

- Dependencies

Data Flow

  1. User action triggers X
  2. X calls Y with Z
  3. Y returns result
  4. Result displayed to user

Error Handling

| Error | Handling | User Message |

|-------|----------|--------------|

| Network failure | Retry 3x | "Connection lost, retrying..." |

| Invalid input | Reject | "Please check your input" |

Testing Strategy

  • Unit tests for each component
  • Integration test for happy path
  • Edge case tests for error handling

Open Questions

  • [ ] Question 1
  • [ ] Question 2

Decision Log

| Date | Decision | Rationale |

|------|----------|-----------|

| YYYY-MM-DD | Chose Option B | Better scalability |

```

πŸ”— INTEGRATION WITH MAESTRO

Triggering Brainstorming

User can invoke explicitly:

```

/maestro design [feature description]

```

Or system detects complex task and suggests:

```

This looks like a significant feature. Would you like to

brainstorm the design first, or proceed directly?

```

After Brainstorming

  1. If continuing to implementation:

- Use @planning-mastery to create detailed plan

- Use @git-worktrees to create isolated workspace

  1. If pausing:

- Design document is saved

- Can resume later with /maestro plan [design-doc]

---

πŸ”— RALPH WIGGUM INTEGRATION

When Ralph Wiggum is active with "Feature Mode":

  1. Before first iteration: Run brainstorming phase
  2. Design document: Required before implementation begins
  3. Scope lock: Don't add features not in design
  4. Design changes: Require explicit approval

πŸ“‹ KEY PRINCIPLES

| Principle | Description |

|-----------|-------------|

| One question at a time | Don't overwhelm with multiple questions |

| Multiple choice preferred | Easier to answer than open-ended |

| YAGNI ruthlessly | Remove unnecessary features from designs |

| Explore alternatives | Always propose 2-3 approaches |

| Incremental validation | Present design in sections, validate each |

| Be flexible | Go back and clarify when needed |

---

πŸ”— RELATED SKILLS

  • @planning-mastery - Create implementation plan from design
  • @git-worktrees - Set up isolated workspace
  • @tdd-mastery - Implement with tests first
  • @clean-code - Quality standards for implementation

More from this repository10

🎯
maestro🎯Skill

maestro skill from xenitv1/claude-code-maestro

🎯
clean-code🎯Skill

Enforces rigorous code quality, security, and anti-hallucination protocols across all AI-generated code outputs, ensuring production-ready, safe implementations.

🎯
mobile-design🎯Skill

Orchestrates complex software architecture through a disciplined governance protocol, enforcing systematic design, continuous learning, and strategic project management.

🎯
testing-patterns🎯Skill

Validates and demonstrates various software testing methodologies and design patterns for robust code development and quality assurance.

🎯
frontend-design🎯Skill

Crafts elite web UI designs with pixel-perfect retro aesthetics, immersive layouts, and UX psychology protocols that prioritize intuitive user experiences.

🎯
python-patterns🎯Skill

Orchestrates complex software architecture through a disciplined, systematic approach with persistent project memory and specialized skill delegation.

🎯
powershell-windows🎯Skill

Orchestrates complex software architecture by enforcing a disciplined, strategic approach to project development with persistent memory and specialized expertise delegation.

🎯
react-patterns🎯Skill

Orchestrates complex software architecture by enforcing a disciplined, proactive approach with persistent project memory and strategic expertise delegation.

🎯
performance-profiling🎯Skill

Identifies performance bottlenecks, optimizes code execution, and provides detailed profiling insights for Python, JavaScript, and Go applications

🎯
architecture🎯Skill

Orchestrates complex software architecture by enforcing a disciplined, strategic approach with persistent project memory and specialized skill delegation.