🎯

wrap

🎯Skill

from neurofoo/agent-skills

VibeIndex|
What it does

Helps systematically expand options, challenge assumptions, manage emotions, and prepare for potential decision failures using the WRAP framework.

πŸ“¦

Part of

neurofoo/agent-skills(24 items)

wrap

Installation

Add MarketplaceAdd marketplace to Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add neurofoo/agent-skills
Add MarketplaceAdd marketplace to Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add neurofoo/agent-skills/thinking-frameworks
Add MarketplaceAdd marketplace to Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add neurofoo/agent-skills/prioritization-skills
Add MarketplaceAdd marketplace to Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add neurofoo/agent-skills/creative-skills
Add MarketplaceAdd marketplace to Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add neurofoo/agent-skills/learning-skills

+ 3 more commands

πŸ“– Extracted from docs: neurofoo/agent-skills
8Installs
-
AddedFeb 4, 2026

Skill Details

SKILL.md

WRAP decision framework countering the four villainsβ€”narrow framing, confirmation bias, short-term emotion, and overconfidence. Use for major decisions or when stuck between options.

Overview

# WRAP Decision Framework

Apply the complete WRAP framework to make a better decision by countering the four villains of decision-making.

Instructions

Work through all four phases sequentially. Each phase targets a specific cognitive bias that undermines good decisions.

Output Format

Decision: [What are we deciding?]

Context: [Key constraints and stakes]

---

W: WIDEN Your Options

Counter: Narrow Framing ("Should I do X?" β†’ "What are all my options?")

Current Framing

How is the decision currently framed? (Often as "whether or not")

Expanded Options

| # | Option | Why It's Worth Considering |

|---|--------|---------------------------|

| 1 | [option] | [rationale] |

| 2 | [option] | [rationale] |

| 3 | [option] | [rationale] |

| 4 | [option] | [rationale] |

Option-Finding Techniques

  • Vanishing options test: "If you couldn't do X, what would you do?"
  • Opportunity cost: "What else could you do with this time/money?"
  • Find someone who solved it: "Who's had this problem?"

---

R: REALITY-TEST Your Assumptions

Counter: Confirmation Bias (seeking evidence that confirms what we want)

Key Assumptions

| Assumption | How Would We Know If Wrong? |

|------------|----------------------------|

| [assumption 1] | [test] |

| [assumption 2] | [test] |

Consider the Opposite

For each option, what would it take to be convinced it's wrong?

Ooch

Is there a small experiment we can run to test this before fully committing?

| Option | Small Test | What We'd Learn |

|--------|-----------|-----------------|

| [option] | [test] | [insight] |

---

A: ATTAIN Distance Before Deciding

Counter: Short-term Emotion (deciding when angry, excited, or desperate)

10/10/10

| Time Horizon | How will you feel about this decision? |

|--------------|----------------------------------------|

| 10 minutes | [how you feel now] |

| 10 months | [how you'll likely feel] |

| 10 years | [long-term perspective] |

What Would I Tell My Best Friend?

If someone you loved faced this decision, what would you tell them?

---

P: PREPARE to Be Wrong

Counter: Overconfidence ("I'm sure this will work")

Premortem

Imagine this decision failed completely. What went wrong?

| Failure Mode | How to Prevent/Detect |

|--------------|----------------------|

| [what could fail] | [safeguard] |

Tripwires

Set a future point to reconsider:

| Tripwire | Action If Triggered |

|----------|-------------------|

| [date or condition] | [what we'll do] |

---

Decision

Recommendation

Based on the WRAP analysis:

> [Your decision and reasoning]

Key Safeguards

  • [Safeguard 1]
  • [Safeguard 2]

Review Date: [When to reassess]

Guidelines

  • Don't skip phasesβ€”each counters a different bias
  • "Should I?" is almost always narrow framing
  • Look for the third option beyond the obvious two
  • Ooch when you canβ€”small tests beat big analysis
  • Set tripwires before you need them

$ARGUMENTS

More from this repository10

πŸͺ
neurofoo-agent-skillsπŸͺMarketplace

Thinking frameworks and decision-making skills for Claude Code

🎯
feynman🎯Skill

Breaks down complex concepts into simple explanations, identifies knowledge gaps, researches to fill them, and refines understanding through structured learning.

🎯
socratic🎯Skill

Guides systematic questioning to deeply examine beliefs, uncover assumptions, and develop clearer understanding through structured, non-confrontational exploration.

🎯
redteam🎯Skill

Performs adversarial analysis to systematically identify and expose potential weaknesses, vulnerabilities, and failure modes in plans, systems, or strategies.

🎯
eos-style🎯Skill

Evaluates writing against Strunk & White's 21 style principles, providing actionable feedback to improve clarity, tone, and writing quality.

🎯
scamper🎯Skill

Systematically explores creative problem-solving by applying seven transformative prompts to generate innovative ideas and breakthrough solutions.

🎯
moscow🎯Skill

Prioritizes items into Must, Should, Could, and Won't categories to clarify project scope and focus critical efforts.

🎯
ooda🎯Skill

Systematically analyze complex decisions by methodically breaking down problems through observation, orientation, decision-making, and execution.

🎯
swot🎯Skill

Conducts comprehensive SWOT analysis to evaluate strategic positioning by systematically examining strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

🎯
wardley🎯Skill

Maps strategic technology components across evolution stages to reveal build vs buy decisions and competitive dynamics for technology strategy.